Moderators: J.E.B. Stuart, MindTrikCallr
Field & Stream wrote:We hold our writers to very high standards—both in terms of writing ability and journalistic integrity.
Colin Kearns
Senior Editor, Field & Stream

Field & Stream wrote:At the beginning of the week, Nathan Garrett started a thread on this forum that quickly started some controversy. As many of you now know, Nathan was selected—along with three other young hunters—as a member of Field & Stream’s Generation Wild Pro Staff.
Generation Wild is a program that Field & Stream started last year to encourage kids to get out and enjoy hunting and fishing. Each year we’ve selected a Pro Staff of four high school students who write blogs and shoot video for Geneartionwild.com and serve as mentors to other young outdoorsmen.
On Saturday, December 12, I got to meet all four pro staffers at the Generation Wild orientation at a sporting lodge in upstate New York. The five of us had a great day. We busted sporting clays and enjoyed a great upland bird hunt. Shortly after the trip, Nathan posted a thread on this forum that contained two photographs: One of the photos showed Nathan and another pro staffer standing with some of the pheasants they shot during the upland hunt. The second photo showed several dead mallards inside the cleaning station at the lodge in New York.
Nathan said he and the other pro staffers shot these mallards that morning. That is false. We spent the morning shooting sporting clays—not waterfowl hunting. In a moment of poor judgment, Nathan lied about hunting ducks with the other pro staffers. He said he made this up because he wanted to promote Generation Wild, but also because he admittedly wanted to show off.
The mallards in that photo are released birds, and they were shot by many hunters and possibly over the course of several days. Understandably, there was some criticism among readers of this forum about the ethics of shooting hens. Please know that I understand and appreciate your concern as conservation-minded hunters. But also know that these birds were all shot legally—and that none were killed by anyone from Field & Stream or Generation Wild.
As for the false information that Nathan provided, Field & Stream did not take this situation lightly. We understand that our silence up until now may have seemed a bit, well, deafening, but we simply wanted to refrain from speaking out until we had the entire story.
We hold our writers to very high standards—both in terms of writing ability and journalistic integrity. Had myself or any other writer or editor at F&S made something up in a story, it would be grounds for immediate dismissal. In Nathan’s case, however, we have chosen to give him a second chance.
At the end of the day, Nathan is just a 15-year-old kid, and we cannot expect him to understand the all of the rules that make good writing and honest journalism. But we can teach him, and that’s exactly what we aim to do. We see this as an opportunity to help Nathan learn a lesson from his mistakes. We were Nathan’s age once, too, and we’re grateful for the guidance we received from more experienced sportsmen.
After meeting Nathan this weekend, I can tell you that he’s a good kid: polite, fun to be around, and a darn good shot. Now, did he get off to a rough start as a Generation Wild pro staffer? Yes. Do I think he can bounce back and become a good mentor to other young hunters and anglers? Absolutely.
Everyone deserves a second chance, and this is Nathan’s.
Colin Kearns
Senior Editor, Field & Stream

Willie wrote:It's in the Honey Hole on the blue site...
dbohunts wrote::beatdeadhorse
tommorrow is opening day. lets move on.
specialized wrote:In my short time here and on these other sites, this kid is nothing but a "douche bag in training"
Once a douche bag, always a douche bag. Its the way of the world, but without them we'd have nothing to argue about on the internet

specialized wrote:you pro-staffers are all the same
specialized wrote:you pro-staffers are all the same
ahahahaa
Well for everyone i am sorry for what i have done. I snaped the picture of the birds when i went into the cleaning station. None of the birds were killed by F&S and us. The birds are perfectly legal they were released mallards.They were shot by another group. Why i did it because, i wanted to show off. I was bored at the airport and did it, without thinking of everyone and F&S. I am truly sorry for what i have done and made F&S and Generation Wild look bad. But they are truly doing good for youth and hunting. And i was very fortunate to be apart of Generation Wild pro-staff. For some of yal that wanted to make me look bad, well you acomplished it very well. As the buisness aspect goes, it is not yours to run. I think i run my buisness very well, and i am proud of what i have acomplished. As the guide thing goes well if you dont think i can guide or be good at it. Well you have to see it to say or not. Some of yal dont know me but over duck hunting chat. And most of yal dont need to hire a guide anyways. So why critizie me for being a guide, you should be supporting what i have done for NC and Mattamuskeet. I mean how often do you run into a 15 year old guide? I dont know any. Do yal? I will not post any more pics on this site if yal want to see how we have done go to my website. Again i am very sorry for what i have done. And please support Generation Wild and F&S. Also i will be doing blogs on Generation Wild of a duck guides life and, a swan hunt please go to there website to view. Also Mike Marsh came hunting with me, i hope this will see a diffrent aspect of me http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/2 ... SPORTS?p=1
Thanks again and sorry,
Nathan Garrett
Generation Wild Pro-Staffer
ABC Calls
"think like a duck not a hunter"
Lodge & Guide Service Owner

CanAmMan wrote:Where is Nathan to give his apology????
Until then.....
Waccamaw Calls wrote:CanAmMan wrote:Where is Nathan to give his apology????
Until then.....
X 2
Waccamaw Calls wrote:ALWAYS GOT ROOM FOR YOU ZACH
I can always count on ya!!!QuakAttack wrote:What has he personally done for this state and Mattamuskeet?
tsmart wrote:QuakAttack wrote:What has he personally done for this state and Mattamuskeet?
Throw out an example, so it'll be clear on what you are looking for.
Like - What have you done for this State and Lake Matt?
(I'm sure since he's only 15, you've done substantially more - being an adult.)
Then we'll all have a guideline to follow.
Thanks,
T.


Bluedog wrote:Dang T-Roy you got a man crush on this boy or what?![]()
My take has always been that if you are going to claim to be a man and brag about how you run your business and daddy ain't footing the bill (not completely true in this case), then you should be willing to take the responsibility of what you say and how you say it. You can't hide behind your age if you want to claim that you are mature for your age, run a business like no other 15 yr old etc, etc, etc. He only claims an age exemption when the heat comes from things he has said or done. You can't have it both ways.

duckplucker wrote:Its not the kids fault its Mike Marsh.
Damn you Mike Marsh, damn you!
BTW who reads field & stream? Last time I read one was in a denist office and it was completely boring. Perhaps ole MM could join the Pro Staff and "spice it up"



seastreet wrote:duckplucker wrote:Its not the kids fault its Mike Marsh.
Damn you Mike Marsh, damn you!
BTW who reads field & stream? Last time I read one was in a denist office and it was completely boring. Perhaps ole MM could join the Pro Staff and "spice it up"
Using such profanity (what I put in bold and underlined) should be grounds for banning as well. Those two words used together are certainly profane in nature.![]()
IGOTTEM2 wrote:Fellows,isn't it time to give this a rest.....aren't we supposted to be talking about duck hunting? I've got my bags packed getting ready to load my dog. Out.

IGOTTEM2 wrote:Fellows,isn't it time to give this a rest.....aren't we supposted to be talking about duck hunting? I've got my bags packed getting ready to load my dog. Out.

Bluedog wrote:Dang T-Roy you got a man crush on this boy or what?

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest